CFB Power Rankings

Independent power rankings, predictions, win probabilities, and game results.

← Return
#34

Wisconsin

Big Ten · Conf Rank #11 ·
Net Rating +12.4
Strength of Schedule #33
Strength of Record #14
Passing & Rushing Breakdown
Passing
Att 143
Comp % 56.6%#118
Yards 1,132
YPA 7.9
ADOT 7.2
INT 5
Success 47.6%#52
PPA 0.20#88
Color = success rate vs FBS average
Deep Left
80.0%
4 / 5 completionssmall sample
Yards 125
YPC 31.3
Success 80.0%#2
PPA 1.54#12
Deep Middle
50.0%
2 / 4 completionssmall sample
Yards 121
YPC 60.5
Success 50.0%#48
PPA 1.13#59
Deep Right
50.0%
2 / 4 completionssmall sample
Yards 55
YPC 27.5
Success 50.0%#24
PPA 0.57#62
Short Left
59.6%
31 / 52 completions
Yards 296
YPC 9.6
Success 50.0%#56
PPA 0.44#36
Short Middle
56.2%
9 / 16 completions
Yards 153
YPC 17.0
Success 56.3%#46
PPA 0.47#67
Short Right
57.9%
33 / 57 completions
Yards 382
YPC 11.6
Success 43.9%#74
PPA 0.25#66
No recorded location 0 / 5 completions
Yards 0
YPA 0.0
Comp % 0.0%
Success 0.0%
PPA -5.99

138 of 143 pass attempts have a recorded zone; the rest are in the row above.

What do these stats mean?
Success rate
Share of plays that gained enough to keep the offense on schedule (roughly half the needed yards on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd/4th).
PPA
Predicted points added per play: how much each play changed the offense's expected points.
ADOT
Average depth of target: how far downfield the average throw travels in the air.
YAC
Yards gained after the catch.
Explosiveness
How big the successful plays are, on average.
Stuff rate
Share of carries stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
Line yards
Rushing yards credited to the offensive line rather than the runner.
Second level / open field
Yards gained beyond the line: the second level is roughly 5-10 yards past the line of scrimmage, open field is farther. The bar under each rushing tile shows each source as a share of the three combined.
#12 (rank)
Season rank among FBS teams with meaningful volume in that spot. #1 is best; on Defense Allowed, #1 allowed the least. Ranks are hidden in single-game views.
Small sample
Fewer than 10 plays in a season (3 in a single game). These tiles are dimmed and not colored.
Defense Allowed
Same stats, but for what opponents did against this team. Lower is better there.

Schedule & Results

Week Opponent Result / Prediction vs Prediction
Wk 1
@ Notre Dame L 13–41
-2.5
Wk 2
vs Western Illinois W 36–9
-11.7
Wk 3
vs Eastern Michigan W 54–10
+22.7
Wk 4
@ Penn State W 24–20
+17.3
Wk 5
vs Michigan State W 31–3
+14.2
Wk 6
Bye — —
Wk 7 Oct 17
@ UCLA Proj: +4.9 38% —
Wk 8 Oct 24
vs USC Proj: +4.7 29% —
Wk 9 Oct 31
@ Iowa Proj: +11.1 26% —
Wk 10 Nov 7
vs Rutgers Proj: -18.1 93% —
Wk 11 Nov 14
@ Maryland Proj: -9.6 71% —
Wk 12 Nov 21
@ Purdue Proj: -9.2 71% —
Wk 13 Nov 28
vs Minnesota Proj: -14.2 84% —