CFB Power Rankings

Independent power rankings, predictions, win probabilities, and game results.

← Return
#91

Rutgers

Big Ten · Conf Rank #18 ·
Net Rating -1.7
Strength of Schedule #32
Strength of Record #116
Passing & Rushing Breakdown
Passing
Att 147
Comp % 58.5%#109
Yards 1,304
YPA 8.9
ADOT 10.5
INT 9
Success 49.0%#38
PPA 0.34#50
Color = success rate vs FBS average
Deep Left
75.0%
3 / 4 completionssmall sample
Yards 164
YPC 54.7
Success 75.0%#5
PPA 3.34#1
Deep Middle
75.0%
3 / 4 completionssmall sample
Yards 143
YPC 47.7
Success 75.0%#8
PPA 3.08#1
Deep Right
37.5%
3 / 8 completionssmall sample
Yards 130
YPC 43.3
Success 37.5%#66
PPA 1.08#30
Short Left
63.0%
17 / 27 completions
Yards 193
YPC 11.3
Success 55.6%#31
PPA 0.60#15
Short Middle
58.0%
29 / 50 completions
Yards 406
YPC 14.0
Success 54.0%#57
PPA 0.72#33
Short Right
68.9%
31 / 45 completions
Yards 268
YPC 8.7
Success 46.7%#65
PPA 0.30#54
No recorded location 0 / 9 completions
Yards 0
YPA 0.0
Comp % 0.0%
Success 0.0%
PPA -5.51

138 of 147 pass attempts have a recorded zone; the rest are in the row above.

What do these stats mean?
Success rate
Share of plays that gained enough to keep the offense on schedule (roughly half the needed yards on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd/4th).
PPA
Predicted points added per play: how much each play changed the offense's expected points.
ADOT
Average depth of target: how far downfield the average throw travels in the air.
YAC
Yards gained after the catch.
Explosiveness
How big the successful plays are, on average.
Stuff rate
Share of carries stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
Line yards
Rushing yards credited to the offensive line rather than the runner.
Second level / open field
Yards gained beyond the line: the second level is roughly 5-10 yards past the line of scrimmage, open field is farther. The bar under each rushing tile shows each source as a share of the three combined.
#12 (rank)
Season rank among FBS teams with meaningful volume in that spot. #1 is best; on Defense Allowed, #1 allowed the least. Ranks are hidden in single-game views.
Small sample
Fewer than 10 plays in a season (3 in a single game). These tiles are dimmed and not colored.
Defense Allowed
Same stats, but for what opponents did against this team. Lower is better there.

Schedule & Results

Week Opponent Result / Prediction vs Prediction
Wk 1
vs Massachusetts L 21–37
-33.3
Wk 2
@ Boston College L 21–28
-6.2
Wk 3
vs USC L 35–42
+12.2
Wk 4
vs Howard W 58–7
+15.1
Wk 5
vs Indiana L 15–47
-7.0
Wk 6
Bye — —
Wk 7 Oct 17
@ Maryland Proj: +5.3 38% —
Wk 8 Oct 24
@ Northwestern Proj: +17.7 12% —
Wk 9 Oct 31
vs Michigan Proj: +16.0 17% —
Wk 10 Nov 7
@ Wisconsin Proj: +18.1 7% —
Wk 11 Nov 14
vs Nebraska Proj: +17.3 17% —
Wk 12 Nov 21
@ Penn State Proj: +20.1 6% —
Wk 13 Nov 28
vs Michigan State Proj: +0.3 50% —