CFB Power Rankings

Independent power rankings, predictions, win probabilities, and game results.

← Return
#55

Memphis

American Athletic · Conf Rank #2 ·
Net Rating +6.8
Strength of Schedule #99
Strength of Record #39
Passing & Rushing Breakdown
Passing
Att 154
Comp % 70.1%#12
Yards 1,628
YPA 10.6
ADOT 10.3
INT 4
Success 56.2%#10
PPA 0.62#5
Color = success rate vs FBS average
Deep Left
25.0%
2 / 8 completionssmall sample
Yards 78
YPC 39.0
Success 25.0%#90
PPA 0.28#76
Deep Middle
80.0%
4 / 5 completionssmall sample
Yards 188
YPC 47.0
Success 80.0%#5
PPA 2.76#4
Deep Right
83.3%
5 / 6 completionssmall sample
Yards 212
YPC 42.4
Success 83.3%#1
PPA 2.76#1
Short Left
72.7%
32 / 44 completions
Yards 298
YPC 9.3
Success 59.1%#18
PPA 0.59#16
Short Middle
86.4%
19 / 22 completions
Yards 242
YPC 12.7
Success 72.7%#1
PPA 1.18#3
Short Right
70.5%
43 / 61 completions
Yards 451
YPC 10.5
Success 49.2%#49
PPA 0.18#95
No recorded location 3 / 7 completions
Yards 159
YPA 22.7
Comp % 42.9%
Success 42.9%
PPA -0.29

146 of 154 pass attempts have a recorded zone; the rest are in the row above.

What do these stats mean?
Success rate
Share of plays that gained enough to keep the offense on schedule (roughly half the needed yards on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd/4th).
PPA
Predicted points added per play: how much each play changed the offense's expected points.
ADOT
Average depth of target: how far downfield the average throw travels in the air.
YAC
Yards gained after the catch.
Explosiveness
How big the successful plays are, on average.
Stuff rate
Share of carries stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
Line yards
Rushing yards credited to the offensive line rather than the runner.
Second level / open field
Yards gained beyond the line: the second level is roughly 5-10 yards past the line of scrimmage, open field is farther. The bar under each rushing tile shows each source as a share of the three combined.
#12 (rank)
Season rank among FBS teams with meaningful volume in that spot. #1 is best; on Defense Allowed, #1 allowed the least. Ranks are hidden in single-game views.
Small sample
Fewer than 10 plays in a season (3 in a single game). These tiles are dimmed and not colored.
Defense Allowed
Same stats, but for what opponents did against this team. Lower is better there.

Schedule & Results

Week Opponent Result / Prediction vs Prediction
Wk 0
@ UNLV W 27–21
+8.0
Wk 1
vs Arkansas State W 42–24
+5.7
Wk 2
@ Boise State L 20–38
-14.4
Wk 3
vs UT Martin W 45–21
-13.1
Wk 4
Bye — —
Wk 5
@ Charlotte W 59–8
+27.8
Wk 6
vs UAB W 38–13
+10.8
Wk 7 Oct 16
@ Tulane Proj: -4.2 53% —
Wk 8 Oct 22
vs East Carolina Proj: -9.3 74% —
Wk 9 Oct 31
vs Army Proj: -16.1 88% —
Wk 10
Bye — —
Wk 11 Nov 13
@ South Florida Proj: +2.9 38% —
Wk 12 Nov 21
@ Navy Proj: -13.4 76% —
Wk 13 Nov 27
vs Temple Proj: -13.6 84% —